From A to Arbitration

Episode 36: A prelude to the JSOV. A pep rally for the Joint Statement on Violence and Behavior in the Workplace.

This podcast episode is a follow-up to a previous episode on opting, a process within a union contract that allows eligible employees to take on a vacant assignment. Corey expresses his gratitude to Jason Leeth for creating a comprehensive episode on opting. Corey acknowledges the complexity of the subject, explaining how it affects various aspects […]

Episode 36: A prelude to the JSOV. A pep rally for the Joint Statement on Violence and Behavior in the Workplace. Read More »

Episode 35: Opting: the most advanced and thorough hold down training available; presented by Jason Leath.

This episode focuses on the topic of opting in a union contract, specifically on how to navigate the process and avoid common pitfalls. Corey and Jason discuss the intricacies of opting, a process that allows eligible employees to take on a vacant assignment. Eligibility for Opting: Only full-time reserve letter carriers, full-time flexible letter carriers,

Episode 35: Opting: the most advanced and thorough hold down training available; presented by Jason Leath. Read More »

Episode 34: Wrapping up discipline and putting it all together. The devastator, the journey, and the squirrel

This episode focuses on the importance of the informal step A meeting in grievance cases. Corey argues that this initial meeting is crucial, as it’s often the first time management reveals their position in writing. He emphasizes the need for shop stewards to be prepared and aggressive in this meeting, encouraging stewards to develop detailed

Episode 34: Wrapping up discipline and putting it all together. The devastator, the journey, and the squirrel Read More »

Episode 33: Article 31 information. Short but oh so sweet

This episode focuses on Article 31 of the National Agreement, which governs information requests during grievance cases. Corey explains that this article is closely linked to Article 17, which deals with the right of stewards to access information for grievance processing. Corey emphasizes that when a shop steward encounters a situation where management fails to

Episode 33: Article 31 information. Short but oh so sweet Read More »

Episode 32: Article 17 and our rights to requested information or as I like to call it the Mosquito, the deadliest killer of all.

This episode discusses the importance of information requests in grievance cases. Corey argues that failure to provide requested information constitutes a serious violation of the collective bargaining agreement, potentially leading to the dismissal of the grievance. Corey emphasizes that stewards have a right to investigate, adjust, and process grievances, including reviewing relevant documents, files, and

Episode 32: Article 17 and our rights to requested information or as I like to call it the Mosquito, the deadliest killer of all. Read More »

Episode 31: Corrective rather than punitive. Let’s think outside the box

This episode focuses on the principle of “corrective rather than punitive” discipline. Corey argues that while arbitrators often interpret “corrective discipline” as synonymous with “progressive discipline,” true corrective action requires management to actively help employees improve their performance rather than simply issuing escalating punishments. Corey emphasizes management’s obligation to manage, using examples like an employee

Episode 31: Corrective rather than punitive. Let’s think outside the box Read More »

Episode 30: Defeating CCA Discipline. Putting the Pieces of the Puzzle Together

This episode is about defending City Carrier Assistants (CCAs) facing disciplinary action by the United States Postal Service. Corey emphasizes that CCAs are particularly vulnerable to discipline because they lack the protections of tenure and a “bank of goodwill.” He highlights the principle of “corrective rather than punitive” discipline that applies to CCAs, emphasizing that

Episode 30: Defeating CCA Discipline. Putting the Pieces of the Puzzle Together Read More »

Neglect of Duty Charges Against NALC President Brian L. Renfroe: Mishandling of Contract Negotiations

Click here to add your Name to the Charges Preamble: Per Article 10 of the NALC Constitution, the following represents the official charges being levied against President Brian L. Renfroe. We are charging him with negligence as the NALC’s chief negotiator and decision-maker on all matters related to the collective bargaining process with the United

Neglect of Duty Charges Against NALC President Brian L. Renfroe: Mishandling of Contract Negotiations Read More »

Shopping cart0
There are no products in the cart!
Continue shopping
0
Scroll to Top